Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./3272/2026 of BHOLA RAM Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3272/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010369732026 + BAIL APPLN. 3272/2026 BHOLA RAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aarushi Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP. CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

BAIL APPLN. 3272/2026 Page 1 of 2

$~6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010369732026

+

BAIL APPLN. 3272/2026

BHOLA RAM

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Aarushi Singh, Advocate.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

09.09.2026

1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 0070/2024, dated 26.03.2024, registered at Police Station Najaf Garh, District Dwarka, Delhi, under Sections 307, 323, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. At the outset, Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, states that the complainant, who is also an eye witness, has been partially examined before the Trial Court. He submits that two other eye witnesses and two material witnesses remain to be examined.

3. In view of the above submissions, Ms. Aarushi Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, does not press the present application at this stage, without prejudice to the petitioner’s right to move the Trial Court This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 15:47:05

BAIL APPLN. 3272/2026 Page 2 of 2 afresh at the appropriate stage. She submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to move the Trial Court, in the event there is an inordinate delay in recording of the evidence of the material witnesses.

4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submissions.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not made any comment on the merits of the case or on any proposed application before the Trial Court, which may be considered by the Trial Court in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 SS/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 15:47:05

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead