Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/2781/2026 of SUSHIL Vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010426682026 + W.P.(CRL) 2781/2026 & CRL.M.A. 27947/2026 SUSHIL ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Adv. along with the petitioner-in-person. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Sr. Adv.

$~98

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010426682026

+

W.P.(CRL) 2781/2026 & CRL.M.A. 27947/2026

SUSHIL

....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Adv. along with the

petitioner-in-person.

versus

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Manoj Pant, APP and Ms. Priyam

Agrawal, Advs. with SI Priyanka.

Mr. Anuj Arya, Mr. Arpit Verma, Mr.

Manish Kumar and Mr. Mayank Rana,

Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 09.09.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. By way of the present petition, the Petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 75/2021, registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi, under Sections 354 and 354D of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), wherein the chargesheet has been filed under Sections 354, 354D and 506 IPC, and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

3. Issue Notice. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

4. The Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their respective counsel as well as the Investigating Officer (‘IO’).

5. Briefly stated, the present FIR came to be registered on 19.02.2021 at Police Station Alipur on the complaint of Respondent No. 2, who alleged that the Petitioner had been following and harassing her and had threatened her with abduction. The complaint further records that, pursuant to such threat, the brother of Respondent No. 2 confronted the Petitioner on 14.02.2021, resulting in an altercation between them. The FIR was initially registered under Sections 354 and 354D IPC and, upon completion of investigation, the chargesheet was filed under Sections 354, 354D and 506 IPC. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties amicably settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Settlement cum Understanding dated 23.03.2026.

6. Respondent No. 2 has stated that she has amicably compromised the matter with the Petitioner, voluntarily and without any pressure, coercion or threat from any corner. It is also stated that the Petitioner suffered disability due to the incident dated 14.02.2021 and is unable to walk properly. Both parties have agreed and affirmed that there is no dispute or controversy remaining between them and that neither party shall initiate any further action against the other in future.

7. On a query made by this Court, Respondent No. 2, who has been identified by the Investigating Officer, has categorically stated that she has entered into the compromise vide Memorandum of Settlement cum Understanding dated 23.03.2026, out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment to quashing the FIR in question.

9. Accordingly, FIR No. 75/2021 registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi, under Sections 354 and 354D IPC, along with the chargesheet filed under Sections 354, 354D and 506 IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed.

10. The present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

11. A copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Trial Court for necessary action and compliance.

12. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2026/JYH/m

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead