Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./2479/2026 of DAKSH SHARMA Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2479/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 08.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010277522026 + BAIL APPLN. 2479/2026 DAKSH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shahid Ali (through videoconferencing) and Mr. Shah Rukh Khan, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~2

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 08.09.2026

CNR No. DLHC010277522026

+

BAIL APPLN. 2479/2026

DAKSH SHARMA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Shahid

Ali

(through

videoconferencing) and Mr. Shah

Rukh Khan, Advocates.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State

with SI Deepak Patwal, PS Janakpuri.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 191/2023 of PS Janakpuri for offence under Section 420 IPC.

2. In furtherance of last order, learned APP for State on instructions of IO/SI Deepak submits that after last date, the accused/applicant joined investigation and now the IO does not want to arrest him because he has cooperated in the investigation.

3. Broadly speaking, by way of order dated 20.05.2026, the co-accused GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4 835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2 eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.08 16:59:39 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:08.09.2026 17:05:27 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2 pages was granted anticipatory bail by this Court, recording a reasoned observation that the present case appears to be only a case of civil liability, though the trial court has to take independent view once chargesheet is filed. The said co-accused is wife of the present accused/applicant.

4. Since prosecution has decided not to oppose this anticipatory bail application, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of his arrest, the accused/applicant shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/SHO concerned.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 08, 2026/dr GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.08 16:59:21 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Date:08.09.2026 17:05:27 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead