Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6576/2026 of ANIL GARG Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR on 7 September 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010418322026 + CRL.M.C. 6576/2026 & CRL.M.As. 27456-57/2026 ANIL GARG .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP. SI Rishi Pal
CRL.M.C. 6576/2026
$~99
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010418322026
+
CRL.M.C. 6576/2026 & CRL.M.As. 27456-57/2026
ANIL GARG
.....Petitioner
Through:
Petitioner in person.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
.....Respondents
Through:
Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP. SI Rishi
Pal Singh, PS-Adarsh Nagar.
Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Mr. Tekchand
Sharma, Mr. Aryan, Mr. Ishwar
Dutt
Sharma, Ms. Mamta, Mr.
Abishek
Ranbir
Chandila,
Advocates for R2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 07.09.2026
1. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 549/2026, dated 11.08.2026, registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District North West, Delhi, under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/251(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [“BNS”], at the instance of his wife – respondent No. 2.
2. It is the argument of the petitioner, who appears in person, that the sections mentioned in the impugned FIR, i.e. Sections 126(2)/251(b) of BNS, are not attracted on the facts of the present case. He also submits This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 10:57:57
CRL.M.C. 6576/2026
that the offences involved are, in fact, non-cognizable.
3. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who appears on advance notice, submits, at the very outset, that the FIR was registered less than a month ago, and the case is still under investigation. Ms. Arya states that at the conclusion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer will take a call as to whether a chargesheet has to be filed, and if so, under which provisions. She submits that the petitioner would have the appropriate remedies available to him in accordance with law, including at the stage of arguments on charge/discharge application, in the event a chargesheet is filed.
4. After some arguments, the petitioner, who is himself an advocate, does not press this petition at this stage, but reserves his rights and contentions before the Trial Court, including at the stage of arguments on charge/discharge application. He also reserves his remedies to approach this Court on the same cause of action at the appropriate stage.
5. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is disposed of as not pressed in the terms of the above submissions.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter, and all rights and contentions of the parties in accordance with law are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 7, 2026 “B”/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 10:57:57