Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1613/2026 of R.D. ROHILLA & ORS. Vs KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN & ORS. on 7 September 2026
$~120 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010419062026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1613/2026 & CM APPL. 60049/2026 R.D. ROHILLA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr. Vinay Jaiswal, Mr. Aayush Bhardwaj and Ms. Namrata Luthra, Advs. (Through VC) versus
$~120
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010419062026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1613/2026 & CM APPL. 60049/2026
R.D. ROHILLA & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. with
Mr.
Vinay
Jaiswal,
Mr.
Aayush
Bhardwaj and Ms. Namrata Luthra,
Advs. (Through VC)
versus
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
Ms. Megha Sharma, SPC with Ms.
Rakshita Goyal, GP for R-1
Mr. S. Rajappa, Mr. R. Gowrishankar
and Mr. G. Dhivyasri, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 07.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 15th December, 2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 18964/2025, wherein, by relying upon the judgment in the case of Bharti Bahuguna Versus Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and Others, SCC OnLine Del 5781, the writ petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment.
2. It is to be noted that as per the aforesaid judgment, the petitioner has been held entitled to receive a pension as per the General Provident Fund (“GPF”)-cum-Pension Scheme in accordance with the Kendriya Vidyalaya
Sangathan (“KVS”) Office Memorandum (“OM”) dated 01st September, 1988, with interest @ 6% per annum on the due amount from the date the same had fallen due till the payment of pension.
3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the judgment in the case of Bharti Bahuguna (supra), on the basis of which the aforesaid order dated 15th December, 2025, has been passed, already stands stayed by the Supreme Court.
5. He hands over to this Court an order dated 09th July, 2026, passed by this Court in another matter being CONT.CAS(C) 1144/2026, which dealt with the submissions with regard to the aforesaid case of Bharti Bahuguna (supra).
6. Order dated 09th July, 2026, in CONT.CAS(C) 1144/2026, reads as under:
7. Perusal of the aforesaid order clearly shows that the judgment in the case of Bharti Bahuguna (supra) already stands stayed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (“SLP”)(C) 15365/2026 vide order dated 06th April, 2026.
8. He submits that there is a batch of matters pending before the Supreme Court and the case number for challenge to the judgment of Bharti Bahuguna (supra) before the Supreme Court, is bearing SLP Diary No. 5044/2026.
9. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the order dated 15th December, 2025, which is the subject matter of the present petition has still not been challenged by the respondents.
10. However, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the aforesaid order dated 15th December, 2025, is based upon the judgment, which already stands stayed by the Supreme Court.
11. Considering the submission made before this Court, no orders can be passed by this Court at this stage.
12. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition, along with the pending application, stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 7, 2026/KR