Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6506/2026 of MANAN GUPTA Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS on 3 September 2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010411512026 + CRL.M.C. 6468/2026, CRL.M.A. 27026/2026 & CRL.M.A. 27025/2026 MANAN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar, Mr. Jagmeet S. Randhawa, Mr. Aamani Golay and Mr. Jasmeet
$~60 & 61
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010411512026
+
CRL.M.C. 6468/2026, CRL.M.A. 27026/2026 & CRL.M.A.
27025/2026
MANAN GUPTA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar, Mr.
Jagmeet S. Randhawa, Mr. Aamani
Golay
and
Mr.
Jasmeet
Singh,
Advocates.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Lalit Kumar, PS EOW.
Mr. Lalit Gupta, Mr. Suyash Sinha,
Mr.
Rashneet
Singh
and
Ms.
Shreeyam Kedia, Advocates for R-2
to R-5.
61
CNR No. DLHC010414312026
+
CRL.M.C. 6506/2026, CRL.M.A. 27204/2026 & CRL.M.A.
27203/2026
MANAN GUPTA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar, Mr.
Jagmeet S. Randhawa, Mr. Aamani
Golay
and
Mr.
Jasmeet
Singh,
Advocates.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Lalit Kumar, PS EOW.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
03.09.2026
1. Since the legal issue involved in both these petitions is similar and parties are slightly different, as requested by both sides, these matters are taken up together.
2. Broadly speaking, it appears that the learned Magistrate allowed the application of the present petitioner under Section 175(3) BNSS and directed registration of FIR against the present respondents. Thereafter, the present respondents filed revision petitions, in which by way of ex-parte order impugned in the present petitions, the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge concerned, stayed operation of the order passed under Section 175(3) BNSS.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioner contends that the impugned orders are not sustainable in the eyes of law, because the same are completely bereft of any reason. In response, learned counsel for respondents submit that the impugned orders are only interlocutory orders, operatable only till next date and that the learned Court of Sessions is yet to hear the complete revision petitions.
4. Under these circumstances, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw these petitions with the request to direct the learned Court of Sessions to dispose of the said revision petitions within time bound period.
5. As requested, both these petitions and the accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn. The learned Court of Sessions is requested to ensure that both the revision petitions are completely disposed of after hearing both sides within a period of four weeks from 28.09.2026, which is the date already fixed for appearance of both sides. In order to ensure no delay, learned counsel for respondents assures to supply complete set of revision paperbooks to learned counsel for present petitioner during the course of the day. It is also directed that neither side shall seek any adjournment before the learned Court of Sessions.
6. For compliance, copy of this order be sent to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge concerned.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 3, 2026/dr