Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1591/2025 of MASTER ASAD KHAN THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN TANUJA BEGAM Vs SH. SURAJ BHAN CHAUHAN & ORS. on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010825282025 + CONT.CAS(C) 1591/2025 MASTER ASAD KHAN THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN TANUJA BEGAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Suryavanshi, Mr. Manish K. Kataria, Advocates (M:9899941711) versus SH. SURAJ BHAN CHAUHAN & ORS.
$~4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010825282025
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1591/2025
MASTER ASAD KHAN THROUGH NATURAL GUARDIAN
TANUJA BEGAM
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Sushil
Kumar,
Mr.
Gaurav
Suryavanshi, Mr. Manish K. Kataria,
Advocates (M:9899941711)
versus
SH. SURAJ BHAN CHAUHAN & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amandeep Singh, Mr. Pradeep
Desodya, Advocates for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 02.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed against the respondent alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 09th June, 2025 passed by the Senior Civil Judge cum Rent Controller, District-South, Saket New Delhi in CS SCJ 269/2025.
2. The said suit had been filed by the petitioner with respect to property bearing no. S-25, (Old property No. S-37-A), Khidki extension, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi-17, wherein, vide the aforesaid order dated 09th June, 2025, directions were given that no construction shall be carried out, and no third party interest would be created in the property.
3. In the meanwhile, upon an application being filed under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), for rejection of the plaint, by the respondent no. 1 herein, the suit has been rejected vide This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:44
judgment dated 09th June, 2026, passed by learned Civil Judge, South District, Saket Court, New Delhi.
4. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 has handed over to this Court a copy of the order dated 09th June, 2026, which is taken on record.
5. Accordingly, since the suit in which the order in question was passed, for the non-compliance of which the present petition has been filed, does not subsist, on account of the rejection of the plaint, no orders can be passed in the present matter.
6. Needless to state that once a suit has been rejected or case has been disposed of, the interim orders merge with the final order.
7. Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2026/au This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/09/2026 at 14:10:44