Delhi High Court
W.P.(CRL)/2656/2026 of RAJNISH Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 2 September 2026
Page 1 of 3 pages $~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010410802026 + W.P.(CRL) 2656/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26975/2026 RAJNISH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vanshita Gupta, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
$~54
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 02.09.2026
CNR No. DLHC010410802026
+
W.P.(CRL) 2656/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26975/2026
RAJNISH
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Vanshita Gupta, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with
SI Pradeep Kumar.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner seeks quashing of order No. F.18/13/2026/HG/ PRISONS/6766-68 dated 25.06.2026 of the competent authority, whereby his request for grant of parole in order to enable him to get filed SLP was rejected on the basis of Rule 1211(vii) of the Delhi Prisons Rules. The said Rule contemplates that parole shall not be granted to a prisoner convicted under POCSO Act unless the competent authority in special circumstances finds it proper to grant the same. GIRISH KATHPALIA
af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,
96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.02 18:02:40 +05'30'
2. At the outset, learned ASC, in all fairness, does not oppose this petition, citing various judgments passed by this Court, including in the case titled Jaswinder Singh vs State of NCT of Delhi, 2026:DHC:3375.
3. The detailed reasoning has already been recorded in the said judgment of Jaswinder Singh (supra), so the same is not being reiterated.
4. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the petition is allowed, thereby directing the release of the petitioner on parole for a period of four weeks subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent; and also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall furnish his mobile phone number and other details to the local police of his residential area and shall remain accessible by keeping his mobile phone switched on; and also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall furnish a copy of his SLP to the concerned Jail Superintendent at the time of his surrender after completion of his parole.
5. It is also specifically directed that the petitioner shall not try to contact any of the prosecution witnesses in any manner whatsoever. It is also made clear that no extension of parole shall be granted to petitioner on any ground whatsoever.
GIRISH KATHPALIA
69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,
0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.02 18:02:30 +05'30'
6. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for compliance. Accompanying application also stands disposed of.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 02, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA
5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,
70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.02 18:02:18 +05'30'