Delhi High Court
RFA(COMM)/592/2026 of ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Vs KUMAR FOOD INDUSTRIES LTD on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010409282026 + RFA(COMM) 592/2026 CM APPL. 58728/2026 CM APPL. 58729/2026 CM APPL. 58730/2026 ASHOK KUMAR JAIN .....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Faiyaz Hasan, Mohd Sajid and Mohd Zaid Akhtar, Advs. along with appellant. versus KUMAR FOOD INDUSTRIES LTD
$~25
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010409282026
+
RFA(COMM)
592/2026
CM
APPL.
58728/2026
CM
APPL.
58729/2026 CM APPL. 58730/2026
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
.....APPELLANT
Through:
Mr. Faiyaz Hasan, Mohd Sajid and
Mohd Zaid Akhtar, Advs. along with
appellant.
versus
KUMAR FOOD INDUSTRIES LTD
.....RESPONDENT
Through:
Mr. Neeraj Grover, Sr. Adv. with Ms.
Sanandika Pratap Singh, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 02.09.2026
1. Yesterday, when the appeal was listed, we passed the following order:- “6. At the outset learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall be challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 16.05.2026 in CS (COMM) 842/2024 only to the extent that the suit of the respondent herein has also been decreed for damages of Rs. 5 lakhs against the appellant herein.
7. In other words, he states that he shall not contest the finding and the conclusion drawn by the learned
District Judge with regard to the impugned mark MAHA SHAKTI BHOG. The submission is taken on record.
8. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
9. Mr. Neeraj Grover, learned senior counsel for the respondent states that though no evidence was placed for quantifying the damages at Rs. 5 lakhs, even otherwise, sufficient documents were filed on the record of the learned District Judge to show costs incurred by the respondent herein while pursuing the litigation before the learned District Judge in the suit wherein the impugned judgment and decree has been passed. He requests for a day’s adjournment to place the same on record, the said documents.
10. At his request, re-notify tomorrow i.e., 02.09.2026.”
2. Today, learned counsel for the parties states that the parties have decided to finally settle the dispute on the following conditions:- i. That the appellant shall pay the respondent an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- as full and final settlement in lieu of Rs. 5,00,000/- and cost as awarded. ii. That the appellant shall withdraw the application no. 5757242 dated 09.01.2023 in Class-30 for registration of trademark “Maha Shakti Bhog” within one week from today by filing an appropriate application before the Trademark Registry. A copy of the same shall be given to the respondent through the counsel.
3. Mr. Faiyaz Hasan, learned counsel for the appellant states that the amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- shall be paid to the respondent in three equal instalments within a period of three months as an outer limit.
4. We take on record the undertaking given by the appellant, who is present in person and also the submission of Mr. Neeraj Grover, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent that the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid terms, as agreed to between them.
5. In terms of the above, the appeal and the pending applications are disposed of. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2026/sr