Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1595/2026 of SADRUDDIN Vs QUTABIDIN & ORS. on 2 September 2026
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010412492026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1595/2026 & CM APPL. 59183/2026 SADRUDDIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Sonu Lohia, Advs. Mob: 7210525656 versus QUTABIDIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS.
$~98
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010412492026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1595/2026 & CM APPL. 59183/2026
SADRUDDIN
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Sonu
Lohia, Advs.
Mob: 7210525656
versus
QUTABIDIN & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 02.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 07th January, 2026, passed by this Court in FAO 59/2023, titled as Sadruddin & Anr. Versus Qutabidin & Ors.
2. Vide order dated 07th January, 2026, directions were passed in the following manner: “ ”
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the appeal being FAO 59/2023, was withdrawn in view of the statement made by the respondents herein that no construction was made on the second floor of the property in question.
4. He draws the attention of this Court to the photograph showing the status of the property in question, as it existed earlier. The said photograph is reproduced as under: “ ”
5. He further relies upon another photograph to submit that goods have now been kept by the respondents in the common area. The said photograph is reproduced as under:
“ ”
6. Perusal of the aforesaid photographs clearly shows that it is not only the respondent but also the petitioner, who has been keeping his goods in the said open common area.
7. Further, this Court notes that there is no construction that has been carried out on the second floor, except installation of a curtain and a cardboard, which has been tied with a cord enabling it to stand upright.
8. Accordingly, there is no violation of the order dated 07th January, 2026.
9. This Court finds no merit in the present petition.
10. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition.
11. Accordingly, the present is dismissed as withdrawn.
12. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2026/SK