Delhi High Court
W.P.(CRL)/2124/2026 of BEGHRAJ Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) on 1 September 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010318322026 + W.P.(CRL) 2124/2026 BEGHRAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Anmol K. Pandey, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok
$~16
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010318322026
+
W.P.(CRL) 2124/2026
BEGHRAJ
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr.
Anmol K. Pandey, Advocates.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with
Mr. Alok Sharma, Ms. Sonia
Malhotra and Ms. Pavitra Dixit,
Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
01.09.2026
1. The petitioner was convicted of offences under Sections 302/363/364A/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, in connection with FIR No. 48/2004, registered at Police Station Narela, by a judgment of the Trial Court dated 11.09.2007, and was sentenced to life imprisonment.
2. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks parole for a period of 30 days in connection with the aforesaid FIR, to arrange finances for his wife and minor child. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 10:48:21
3. The State has placed on record a copy of an order dated 04.08.2026, stating that the Jail Superintendent and police authorities have not recommended grant of parole to the petitioner.
4. In view of the above, Mr. Siddharth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the aforesaid order be communicated to the petitioner, and seeks to reserve the petitioner’s right to challenge the same in accordance with law.
5. Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State, undertakes that the order rejecting the petitioner’s application for parole will be supplied to the petitioner within two days from today.
6. As no further orders are sought in this writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the petitioner. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 ‘pv/KA’/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 10:48:21