Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1581/2026 of MD AZAM ANSARI ADVOCATE & ANR. Vs INSPECTOR OM PRAKASH THAKUR & ANR. on 1 September 2026
$~102 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010408542026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1581/2026 & CM APPL. 58585/2026 MD AZAM ANSARI ADVOCATE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Afjal Ansari, Ms. Azeema and Mr. Zunaid, Advs. Mob: 7065785774 Email: adv.afjalansari@gmail.com versus
$~102
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010408542026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1581/2026 & CM APPL. 58585/2026
MD AZAM ANSARI ADVOCATE & ANR.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Afjal Ansari, Ms. Azeema and
Mr. Zunaid, Advs.
Mob: 7065785774
Email: adv.afjalansari@gmail.com
versus
INSPECTOR OM PRAKASH THAKUR & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr.
Hitesh
Kumar
Bagri,
Senior
Panel Counsel for UOI with Mr.
Akash Gupta, GP
Mob: 9711101306
Email: hitesh.bagri@yahoo.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 01.09.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 31st July, 2026, passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class–8/South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in CT 2235/2026, titled as Mehraz Bano & Anr. Versus Mohammad Arshi & Ors., and the directions of the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Versus Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others, (2014) 2 SCC 1.
2. This Court notes that the said order dated 31st July, 2026, reads as under: “ ”
3. This Court is informed that the aforesaid petition is still pending, and is next listed before the Trial Court on 30th September, 2026.
4. Since the issue with regards the lodging of a First Information Report (“FIR”) based on the petitioners’ complaint is already pending before the Court of appropriate jurisdiction, no orders are required to be passed in the present petition, for the time being.
5. Noting the aforesaid the present petition is accordingly disposed of.
6. The pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/SK