Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./2427/2026 of MOHIT Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) on 1 September 2026
2427/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010273632026 + BAIL APPLN. 2427/2026 MOHIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Mr. Anil Malik, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.
$~4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010273632026
+
BAIL APPLN. 2427/2026
MOHIT
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Kartik Kumar, Mr. Gaurav
Sharma,
Mr.
Anil
Malik,
Advocates.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.
Insp.
Ajay
Katewa,
PS-KNK
Marg.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
01.09.2026
1. By way of the present application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”], the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 438/2023, dated 05.10.2023, registered at Police Station K.N. Katju Marg, for offences punishable under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]. Upon completion of investigation, charge-sheet has since filed before the learned Trial Court, whereupon Sections 120-B and 34 of the IPC have also been invoked against the accused.
2. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has placed on record a Status Report dated 09.07.2026. He submits that This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 09:44:37
four material witnesses, namely, Vikas, Aman, Yogesh and Naresh, are yet to be examined.
3. In view of the above, Mr. Kartik Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application at this stage, without prejudice to the applicant’s right to approach the learned Sessions Court afresh, at the appropriate stage.
4. Mr. Kumar, however, seeks a direction for expeditious recording of the evidence of the aforesaid material witnesses. The learned Sessions Court is requested to expedite the recording of their evidence, to the extent possible and practicable, having regard to its own Board and the age of the matters pending before it. Mr. Chauhan also assures the Court that the prosecution shall extend its cooperation in this regard.
5. In the event of any inordinate delay in recording the evidence of the aforesaid material witnesses, the applicant shall be at liberty to approach the learned Sessions Court afresh.
6. The bail application, alongwith any pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the aforesaid submission.
7. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on any application that may be filed by the applicant hereafter, which shall be considered by the appropriate Court on its own merits, in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 “B”/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 09:44:37