Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6400/2026 of FIROZ Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 1 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010407882026 + CRL.M.C. 6400/2026, CRL.M.A. 26771/2026, CRL.M.A. 26772/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26773/2026 FIROZ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Junaid Nisar and Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Druav
$~44
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010407882026
+
CRL.M.C.
6400/2026,
CRL.M.A.
26771/2026,
CRL.M.A.
26772/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26773/2026
FIROZ
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Junaid Nisar and Mr. Nakul
Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Druav Pandey and Ms. Ananya
Bose,
Advocates
for
R-1
with
Inspector Priyanka, PS Crime Branch,
Sunlight Colony.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
01.09.2026
1. Petitioner has assailed order dated 12.08.2026 of the learned trial court, whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 348 BNSS for recall of PW19 was dismissed.
2. Passover awaiting the arguing counsel requested by counsel for petitioner. But on account of pending heavy board, passover is not possible.
3. I am of the prima facie view that this petition is not maintainable, because Section 438(2) BNSS prohibits revision against interlocutory order and it is trite that unless a case of gross injustice is set up, the High Court cannot exercise inherent powers to allow backdoor entry to what is prohibited by law. In the present case, the admitted position is that PW-19, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2026 at 10:42:58
who is sought to be recalled had been duly cross-examined at the time of his testimony before the trial court.
4. At this stage, the arguing counsel for petitioner has appeared and seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
5. As requested, the petition and the accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026/dr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2026 at 10:42:58