Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/2051/2026 of PURAN PRASAD Vs STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010304972026 + W.P.(CRL) 2051/2026 PURAN PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Sekhri, Advocate. versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State (through videoconferencing). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

$~15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010304972026

+

W.P.(CRL) 2051/2026

PURAN PRASAD

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Abhinav Sekhri, Advocate.

versus

STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State

(through videoconferencing).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

01.09.2026

1. Petitioner seeks mandamus directing the respondent to transfer him from closed jail to semi open jail.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that representation of the petitioner on this issue was submitted on 21.05.2026, but the same has not been decided till date.

3. Learned ASC appearing on advance intimation assures that representation of petitioner shall be disposed of positively within four weeks.

4. Relying upon this assurance of the ASC, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh, if so required, depending upon fate of his representation.

5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2026 at 11:43:56

sought. However, it is also made clear that if representation of the petitioner is not decided within four weeks, petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh petition for grant of mandamus.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 ‘rs’

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/09/2026 at 11:43:56

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead