Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1946/2025 of MUKESH PHUTELA & ORS. Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH COMMISSIONER & ANR. on 31 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011049632025 + CONT.CAS(C) 1946/2025 MUKESH PHUTELA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanskar and Mr. Vinay, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH COMMISSIONER & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh,

$~30

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC011049632025

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1946/2025

MUKESH PHUTELA & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Sanskar and Mr. Vinay, Advs.

versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH

COMMISSIONER & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Abhinav Singh, Sc with Mr. Pearl

Khurana, Adv. for MCD

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 31.08.2026

1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 24th February, 2025 passed in W.P.(C) 11425/2024, wherein, it had been directed as follows: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”

2. A Status Report has now been filed on behalf of the Municipal

Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), wherein, it is stated as follows: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”

3. Perusal of the aforesaid Status Report clearly shows that pursuant to the directions of this Court, the property in question, i.e., E-16/644, Bapa

Nagar, Tank Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi was de-sealed temporarily by the MCD for a period of thirty days.

4. After the property was de-sealed, the petitioner has already removed the malba and has also demolished the columns on the ground floor and basement, and the property has been re-sealed by the MCD on 27th May, 2025.

5. On a pointed query by this Court, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-MCD submits that as on date there is no unauthorized construction existing in the property in question.

6. Accordingly, if that be the case, the MCD is directed to forthwith de- seal the property. However, it is clarified that any further construction in the property shall be carried out by the petitioner only after obtaining a sanctioned building plan from the MCD.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to approach the Deputy Commissioner of the Karol Bagh Zone for the purpose of de-sealing of the property.

8. The property shall be de-sealed by the MCD after following the due procedure, in accordance with law.

9. It is directed that the petitioner shall not misuse the property in any manner whatsoever and shall not carry out any unauthorized construction in the property.

10. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is accordingly, disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 31, 2026/KR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead