Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1557/2026 of UMESH KUMAR TANWAR AND ORS Vs SH.SANJEEV KHIRWAR THE COMMISSIONER OF MCD AND ORS on 31 August 2026
$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010403752026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1557/2026 & CM APPL. 58027/2026 UMESH KUMAR TANWAR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. M.K. Khan, Mr. Aman Mirza and Ms. Tanzeem Bano, Advs. Mob: 9873787009 Email:
$~89
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010403752026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1557/2026 & CM APPL. 58027/2026
UMESH KUMAR TANWAR AND ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. M.K. Khan, Mr.
Aman Mirza and Ms. Tanzeem Bano,
Advs.
Mob: 9873787009
Email: adv.kasimkhan@gmail.com
versus
SH. SANJEEV KHIRWAR THE COMMISSIONER OF MCD AND
ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr.
Kunal
Rawat,
Ms.
Vanshika
Varshney and Mr. Charanjeet Singh,
Advs. for R-1/MCD
Mob: 9312012009
Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr. Mayank
Dhyani
panel
counsel
for
R-3
(Through VC)
Mob: 9717888012
Email: prmdkumar20@gmail.com
Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Senior Panel
Counsel for R-4 to 6/UOI with Mr.
Suraj Kumar Jha, Adv. (Through VC)
Mob:9958378565
Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Ranjan
Vyas,
Advs.
for
R-7
Mob: 9810035336
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 31.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 22nd May, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7295/2026, wherein, directions were issued in the following manner: “ ”
2. In response, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) has handed over to this Court, certain documents in order to show that requisite action against the property in question already stands taken.
3. The said documents are taken on record.
4. This Court notes the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the MCD that action was taken on 25th August, 2026, and the existing construction in the property in question has been made inhabitable.
5. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that further construction in the property in question, is going on.
6. Learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 7 to 9 disputes the said fact, and submits that no construction is going on presently at the property in question.
7. He further draws the attention of this Court to the paragraph 11 of the present petition, which reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
8. By referring to the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 7 to 9 submits that the petitioner and respondent nos. 7 to 9 are cousins, and that the present petition is more in the nature of a private property dispute.
9. Considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that the MCD and the Police shall ensure that no unauthorized construction takes place in the property in question.
10. However, respondent nos. 7 to 9 are at liberty to carry out construction after obtaining due sanction from the MCD.
11. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of.
12. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 31, 2026/SK