Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6301/2026 of RAVESH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 25 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010399862026 + CRL.M.C. 6301/2026 RAVESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Natwar Rai, Advocate (through video conferencing) and Mr. Sidheswar, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha,
$~52
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010399862026
+
CRL.M.C. 6301/2026
RAVESH KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Natwar Rai, Advocate (through
video
conferencing)
and
Mr.
Sidheswar, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State
with IO/SI Sanyukta.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
25.08.2026
1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 444/2014 of PS South Campus for offence under Section 354D/506 IPC on merits.
2. The allegations levelled in the impugned FIR being highly obnoxious and heinous, inherent powers cannot be invoked to quash the FIR. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the complainant de facto had granted no objection certificate to the present petitioner way back in November 2024 regarding the impugned FIR. In this regard, learned counsel for petitioner refers to order dated 29.10.2025 of the trial court. But that order also does not show that it is the complainant de facto who made such statement before the trial court; and it is only some proxy counsel before the trial court who This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:15:33
stated that the complainant de facto is ready to cooperate with the present petitioner to file quashing petition before this court. In other words, presently there is nothing to show that the quashing is sought on the basis of settlement between the petitioner and the complainant de facto.
3. Further, what happened in the trial court after 29.10.2025 has not been revealed by either side. Even the IO/SI Sanyukta is completely unaware as to what is the status before the trial court.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. As requested, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J AUGUST 25, 2026/ry
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:15:33