Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1630/2025 of RAJESH CHAUDHARY Vs ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS on 25 August 2026
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010850522025 + CONT.CAS(C) 1630/2025 & CM APPL. 68207/2025, CM APPL. 68208/2025, CM APPL. 68238/2025 RAJESH CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Bansal, Ms. Namrata Kathuria and Ms. Rakshika Saxena, Advocates Mob: 9868566649
$~8
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010850522025
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1630/2025 & CM APPL. 68207/2025, CM APPL.
68208/2025, CM APPL. 68238/2025
RAJESH CHAUDHARY
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Jai Bansal, Ms. Namrata Kathuria
and Ms. Rakshika Saxena, Advocates
Mob: 9868566649
Email: bansal.jai@gmail.com
versus
ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 25.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the directions in the judgment dated 15th November, 2022, passed in W.P.(C) 2554/2012, read with orders dated 04th January, 2024 and 24th May, 2024, passed in CONT.CAS(C) 1219/2023.
2. This Court notes that vide judgment dated 15th November, 2022, directions had been issued in favour of the petitioner, in the following manner: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
3. When the aforesaid directions were not complied by the respondent, an earlier contempt petition being CONT.CAS(C) 1219/2023 came to be filed by the petitioner herein.
4. Vide order dated 04th January, 2024, it was recorded as follows:
5. The said contempt petition was disposed of vide order dated 24th May, 2024, by noting as follows:
6. Perusal of the aforesaid orders show that pursuant to the directions passed in the judgment dated 15th November, 2022, the Directorate of Education (“DoE”) Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (“GNCTD”) offered appointment to the petitioner to the post of Data Entry
Operator on contractual basis in their Caretaking Branch.
7. This Court is informed that the contract of the petitioner has now been extended till 15th October, 2026.
8. Accordingly, since the petitioner has been offered contractual appointment in compliance with the directions as passed in the judgment dated 15th November, 2022, the respondent shall continue to engage the services of the petitioner, by way of rehabilitation to the petitioner.
9. Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the present petition along with the pending applications is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 25, 2026 ak