Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1493/2026 of SIDDHIVINAYAK SHIKSHAN PRASARK MANDALS R.K. B.ED. COLLEGE Vs MS. SUKHGEET KAUR, IOFS, MEMBER SECRETARY, NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR on 25 August 2026
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010386632026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1493/2026 SIDDHIVINAYAK SHIKSHAN PRASARK MANDALS R.K. B.ED. COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay and Mr. Jayant Dubey, Advocates Mob: 9871522124 Email:
$~6
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010386632026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1493/2026
SIDDHIVINAYAK
SHIKSHAN
PRASARK
MANDALS
R.K.
B.ED. COLLEGE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant,
Mr. Vineet Upadhyay and Mr. Jayant
Dubey, Advocates
Mob: 9871522124
Email:
mayankravilegaloffice@gmail.com
versus
MS.
SUKHGEET
KAUR,
IOFS,
MEMBER
SECRETARY,
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Anuj Kapoor and Mr. Nandeesh
Nanda, Advocates
Mob: 8130324433
Email:
anujkapoorchambers@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 25.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 06th August, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 11129/2026, wherein, directions had been issued in the following manner: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
2. In response to the present petition, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on advance notice, has handed over to this Court a copy of the Restoration Order dated 18th August, 2026.
3. The said Restoration Order issued by the Western Regional Committee (“WRC”) National Council for Teacher Education (“NCTE”), reads as under:
4. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is satisfied with the said Restoration Order passed by the respondent- NCTE.
5. He further confirms the fact that communication with regards the Restoration Order has also been sent by NCTE to the petitioner’s affiliating body as well as to the concerned department of the state authority.
6. However, he submits that the status of the petitioner as a recognised institution is also to be reflected on the official website of the NCTE.
7. Responding to the same, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-NCTE submits that the needful shall be done, within a period of two days, and the status of the petitioner as a recognised institution shall be duly reflected on the official website of the NCTE.
8. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.
9. No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
10. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 25, 2026 ak