Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./1785/2026 of DIILP TIWARI Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1785/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010199762026 + BAIL APPLN. 1785/2026 DIILP TIWARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Verma, Mr. Nayan Maggo, Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Ms. Sulakshana, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir

$~2

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010199762026

+

BAIL APPLN. 1785/2026

DIILP TIWARI

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Karan

Verma,

Mr.

Nayan

Maggo, Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Ms.

Sulakshana, Advocates.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP

SI Sneh Singh, PS Anand Vihar

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 25.08.2026

1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 281/2023, dated 18.07.2023, lodged at Police Station Anand Vihar, Shahdara, Delhi, under Section 376D/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

2. At the very outset, Mr. Karan Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner wishes to withdraw this application, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the Trial Court.

3. However, Mr. Verma submits that only the Investigating Officer is left to be examined, and he seeks directions for expeditious recording of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:01:25

his evidence.

4. As far as this aspect is concerned, the Trial Court is requested to proceed as expeditiously as possible, having regard to its own board and the age of matters pending before it.

5. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, submits that the prosecution shall cooperate in the said process.

6. The application is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.

7. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open in accordance with law before the Trial Court. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 25, 2026 Tg/AD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:01:25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead