Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6264/2026 of LALIT SINGH & ORS. Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. on 24 August 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010398172026 + CRL.M.C. 6264/2026 LALIT SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Arun Kumar. Mr.
$~114
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010398172026
+
CRL.M.C. 6264/2026
LALIT SINGH & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Arun
Kumar.
Mr. Pranav Prakash, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 24.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 26137/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
1. By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 929/2017 dated 11.12.2017, registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, under Sections 323/342/506/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of a settlement stated to have been arrived at between the parties.
2. It appears that the complainant is not a party to the compromise deed and, further, that all the victims have neither been named in the compromise deed nor impleaded as parties to the present petition. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:13:43
3. In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Suraj Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh upon entering into a comprehensive settlement with the complainant and all the victims.
4. The petition, alongwith any pending application, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter, and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 24, 2026 “B”/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:13:43