Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./3512/2026 of SAURABH Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3512/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010398292026 + BAIL APPLN. 3512/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26147/2026 SAURABH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram and Mr. Ayushman Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF

BAIL APPLN. 3512/2026

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~82

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 24.08.2026

CNR No. DLHC010398292026

+

BAIL APPLN. 3512/2026 & CRL.M.A. 26147/2026

SAURABH

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Aditya

Vikram

and

Mr.

Ayushman Sharma, Advocates.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for State

with SI Bhag Singh, PS Okhla

Industrial Area.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 80013271/2025 of Police Station Okhla Industrial Area for offence under 318(4)/3(5) of BNS.

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for accused/applicant admits that as on date, the accused/applicant is not in jail. As reflected from record, the accused/applicant repeatedly availed extension of the interim bail and was GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.24 16:52:50 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:24.08.2026 17:19:12 Signature Not Verified

BAIL APPLN. 3512/2026

Page 2 of 2 pages ultimately directed to surrender today. Those orders had been passed by the Link Magistrate.

3. Since as on date the accused/applicant is not in jail, as he has not surrendered, in my view this application for grant of regular bail is not maintainable. Therefore, the bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 24, 2026/dr GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.24 16:52:41 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:24.08.2026 17:19:12 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead