Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/5483/2026 of GREENLINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 24 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010172302026 + W.P.(C) 5483/2026, CM APPL. 26904/2026, CM APPL. 26905/2026 & CM APPL. 26906/2026 GREENLINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahar Irfan, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.
$~14
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010172302026
+
W.P.(C) 5483/2026, CM APPL. 26904/2026, CM APPL. 26905/2026
& CM APPL. 26906/2026
GREENLINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Sahar Irfan, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC
with Ms.Aditi Singh, GP & Mr. Nipun
Jain, Adv. for R-1.
Mr.
Shlok
Chandra,
SSC
with
Ms.Naincy Jain & Ms. Madhavi
Shukla, JSCs & Mr. Udit Dad, Advs.
for R-2 to 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
24.08.2026
1. The present writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred the petitioner/assessee for the following four prayers: “a) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned notice dated 28.01.2026 issued under Section 226(3) of the Act by Respondent No.2;
b) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to forthwith give effect to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:46:18
the binding appellate order dated 24.12.2009 passed by Ld. CIT(A) and order dated 21.01.2011 passed by the Ld. ITAT and to delete the non-existent demand for AY 2006–07 from all records, including the income-tax portal;
c) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to refund all amounts illegally recovered and/or adjusted under Section 245 of the Act against the non-existent demand for AY 2006-07 along with applicable interest;
d) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.2 to withdraw all consequential recovery actions, including attachment of the Petitioner’s bank account;
e) award costs of the present proceedings in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent No.2 to 4 for their arbitrary and high-handed conduct;”
2. Ms. Naincy Jain, learned junior standing counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4/Revenue, at the outset, submitted that all the petitioner’s grievances have been favourably addressed by the respondent/Assessing Officer, for which she referred to a communication in this regard that has been sent to Mr. Shlok Chandra, learned senior standing counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4.
3. Mr. Sahar Irfan, learned counsel for the petitioner, accepts this position.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition, along with all the pending applications, is disposed of as having become infructuous. DINESH MEHTA, J. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. AUGUST 24, 2026/kk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 15:46:18