Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1504/2026 of R L PATEL PRIMARY TRAINING COLLEGE Vs MS RASHMI SHUKLA REGIONAL DIRECTOR WESTERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE NCTE AND ANR on 21 August 2026
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010391982026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1504/2026 R L PATEL PRIMARY TRAINING COLLEGE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chintan V. Acharya, Adv. (Through VC) Mob: 9925022615 Email: advshdave@gmail.com versus MS RASHMI SHUKLA REGIONAL DIRECTOR WESTERN
$~71
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010391982026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1504/2026
R L PATEL PRIMARY TRAINING COLLEGE
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Chintan
V.
Acharya,
Adv.
(Through VC)
Mob: 9925022615
Email: advshdave@gmail.com
versus
MS RASHMI SHUKLA
REGIONAL DIRECTOR WESTERN
REGIONAL COMMITTEE NCTE AND ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Anuj Kuma and Mr. Nandeesh
Nanda, Advs. for R-1 & 2
Mob: 8130324433
Email:
anujkapoorchambers@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 21.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 17th June, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 8211/2026, wherein, the following directions were issued: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
2. In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has handed over to this Court, a copy of Corrigendum dated 19th August, 2026, to submit that the status of the petitioner-institution has been updated on the website of National Council for Teacher Education (“NCTE”) to show their sanctioned intake capacity as 100 seats.
3. The aforesaid document is taken on record.
4. He further submits that the Department of Primary Education, of Gujarat, has been communicated, in regards the aforesaid corrigendum.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has further handed over to this Court a screenshot from the official website of the respondent- NCTE, wherein, the status of the petitioner-institution has been shown as having a sanctioned intake capacity of 100 seats.
6. The said screenshot is reproduced as under:
7. Accordingly, the order passed by this Court stands complied with.
8. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 21, 2026/SK