Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6131/2026 of MOHD ARMAN REHMAAN & ORS. Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 21 August 2026
Page 1 of 3 $~86 to 88, 92 & 94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010389062026 + CRL.M.C. 6131/2026 MOHD ARMAN REHMAAN & ORS. .....Petitioners versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents # CNR No. DLHC010389312026 + CRL.M.C. 6138/2026 MOHD RIZWAN
$~86 to 88, 92 & 94
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010389062026
+
CRL.M.C. 6131/2026
MOHD ARMAN REHMAAN & ORS.
.....Petitioners
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
CNR No. DLHC010389312026
+
CRL.M.C. 6138/2026
MOHD RIZWAN QURESHI & ORS.
.....Petitioners
versus
STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
CNR No. DLHC010391192026
+
CRL.M.C. 6150/2026
MOHD FAIZAN QURESHI & ORS.
.....Petitioners
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
CNR No. DLHC010392162026
+
CRL.M.C. 6174/2026
ABDUL REHMAN & ORS.
.....Petitioners
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
CNR No. DLHC010392372026
+
CRL.M.C. 6183/2026
ABDUL REHMAN & ANR.
.....Petitioners
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Appearance:
Mr. Rajesh Singh, Mr. Raj Kumar, Ms. Roopal Sharma, Ms. Maryam Junaid, Ms. Renuka Tiwari and Md. Md. Alfahad Qureshi, Advocates for petitioner in Item Nos. 86, 92, 94 and private respondents in Item Nos. 87
and 88.
Mr. Varun Goswami, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sahil Agarwal, Ms.
Ritanya Singh, Mr. Adeel Ahmad Khan and Mr. Raghunandan, Advocates for petitioner in Item Nos. 87 and 88, and private respondents in Item Nos. 86, 92 and 94.
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP with SI Sakshi and SI Nishant Nagar.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
21.08.2026
1. By way of these petitions under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of five FIRs being – [a] FIR No. 188/2024 dated 04.07.2024, registered under Sections 109(1)/61/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [“BNS”], and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 [subject matter of CRL.M.C. 6131/2026]; [b] FIR No. 94/2024 dated 20.03.2024, registered under Sections 376/498A/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”] [subject matter of CRL.M.C. 6138/2026]; [c] FIR No. 189/2024 dated
06.07.2024, registered under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the BNS [subject matter of CRL.M.C. 6150/2026]; [d] FIR No. 109/2024 dated 05.04.2024, registered under Sections 376/354/506 of the IPC, and Sections 4/8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [subject matter of CRL.M.C. 6174/2026]; [e] FIR No. 121/2024 dated 18.04.2024, under Section 228A of the IPC [subject matter of CRL.M.C. 6183/2026], all registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, District South-East, Delhi. The petitions are predicated on the ground of a settlement.
2. After some arguments, on instructions from the petitioners, who are present in Court, Mr. Varun Goswami, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners in CRL.M.C. 6138/2026 and CRL.M.C. 6150/2026, and Mr. Rajesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners in CRL.M.C. 6131/2026, CRL.M.C. 6174/2026, and CRL.M.C. 6183/2026, seek permission to withdraw these petitions, without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the parties in the pending criminal proceedings.
3. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the cases. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 21, 2026 SS/KA/