Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./3461/2026 of VINOD KUMAR SHARMA Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3461/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010391762026 + BAIL APPLN. 3461/2026 & CRL.M.A. 25791/2026 VINOD KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Kumar, Mr. Manoj, Mr. Amit Kaushik and Mr. Saura Gaur,

BAIL APPLN. 3461/2026

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~55

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 21.08.2026

CNR No. DLHC010391762026

+

BAIL APPLN. 3461/2026 & CRL.M.A. 25791/2026

VINOD KUMAR SHARMA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Akshay Kumar, Mr. Manoj, Mr.

Amit Kaushik and Mr. Saura Gaur,

Advocates

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Amit Ahalwat, APP for State

with IO/SI Jaiveer Singh.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The applicant/accused seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 116/2025 of Police Station Cyber Police Station Dwarka for offence under 318(4)/319/3(5) BNS.

2. At the outset, learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Jaiveer Singh, submits that as on date, the IO does not have evidence sufficient to arrest the accused/applicant, but further investigation is continuing, so as and when GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cac ca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c48796 5ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.21 17:34:10 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:21.08.2026 17:35:32 Signature Not Verified

BAIL APPLN. 3461/2026

Page 2 of 2 pages there is sufficient evidence to arrest him, the IO shall give him a prior notice of at least one week, so that he may again approach the court for anticipatory bail.

3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of directing that as and when the IO has sufficient evidence to arrest the accused/applicant, he shall give a one week prior notice in writing to the accused/applicant, so that the accused/applicant may file a fresh anticipatory bail application. In the meanwhile, it is directed that as and when called in writing by the IO, the accused/applicant shall join the investigation.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 21, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626ca cca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c4879 65ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.21 17:33:58 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:21.08.2026 17:35:32 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead