Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./6089/2026 of NITISH KUMAR Vs SANGEETA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010385852026 + CRL.M.C. 6089/2026 & CRL.M.As. 25472-74/2026 NITISH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan, Advocate. versus SANGEETA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R

CRL.M.C. 6089/2026

$~87

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010385852026

+

CRL.M.C. 6089/2026 & CRL.M.As. 25472-74/2026

NITISH KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Chandan, Advocate.

versus

SANGEETA

.....Respondent

Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 19.08.2026

1. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner assails an order dated 03.12.2025, passed by the learned Mahila Court, in proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, by which an interim maintenance of Rs. 8,300/- per month was awarded to the respondent - wife.

2. The petitioner has placed on record an affidavit of assets and liabilities filed by him before the learned Mahila Court in September 2024, in which he himself declared a monthly income of Rs. 25,000/- per month. The petitioner has also filed a salary slip showing that he was working as a Machine Operator in a concern by the name of A.S. Plastic since July 2024, drawing the said salary of Rs. 25,000/-.

3. It is however, contended by Mr. Chandan, learned counsel for the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2026 at 10:11:10

CRL.M.C. 6089/2026

petitioner, that the petitioner has since lost his job. As the petitioner’s case is based on an alleged change in circumstance, Mr. Chandan seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to take remedies available to him before the learned Mahila Court. Mr. Chandan also submits that the petitioner may be permitted to seek reference to mediation before the learned Mahila Court, so that the disputes between the parties can be comprehensively resolved.

4. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the aforesaid submissions.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not issued notice in this petition and has not made any observation on the merits of the case. The rights and contentions of the parties may be adjudicated by the learned Mahila Court in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 19, 2026 SS/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2026 at 10:11:10

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead