Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./4480/2026 of RAVINDER KUMAR ORS Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI ORS on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

4480/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 19.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010267462026 + CRL.M.C. 4480/2026 RAVINDER KUMAR ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kuntal and Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ORS .....Respondents

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~39

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 19.08.2026

CNR No. DLHC010267462026

+

CRL.M.C. 4480/2026

RAVINDER KUMAR ORS

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Kuntal and Mr. Prashant Kumar,

Advocates

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI ORS

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr Hemant Mehla, APP for State

with IO/Inspector Virender

Respondent no. 2 in person.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 804/2022 of PS Paschim Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners.

2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.19 17:10:38 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:19.08.2026 18:02:47 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2 pages

3. The respondent no. 2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/Inspector Virender. I have spoken with respondent no. 2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. No child was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2. The respondent no. 2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.

4. Having spoken with respondent no. 2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.

5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 804/2022 of PS Paschim Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 19, 2026 ‘rs’ GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.19 17:10:27 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:19.08.2026 18:02:47 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead