Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./3399/2026 of PARVATI VERMA Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR on 19 August 2026
3399/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010384592026 + BAIL APPLN. 3399/2026&CRL.M.A. 25379/2026 PARVATI VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amjad Khan & Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents
BAIL APPLN. 3399/2026
$~78
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010384592026
+
BAIL APPLN. 3399/2026&CRL.M.A. 25379/2026
PARVATI VERMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Amjad Khan & Mr. Sumit
Kumar, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT
OF DELHI AND ANR
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP.
SI Dhananjay Gupta, PS Kirti
Nagar.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 19.08.2026
1. By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No.36/2018, dated 28.01.2018, registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. The petitioner’s earlier bail application was dismissed vide order of the Sessions Court dated 24.07.2026, in which the Court noted as follows: “Ld. Substitute Spl. PP argued that 21 witnesses were mentioned in the list of prosecution witnesses and 11 witnesses were mentioned in the supplementary charge-sheet. Out of 32 witnesses, 31 witnesses stand either examined or dropped. Only Ld. MM mentioned at serial no. 7 was left. Ld. Substitute Spl. PP submitted that on the last date of hearing i.e. 11.07.2026, Ld. Regular This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2026 at 10:03:36
BAIL APPLN. 3399/2026
Prosecutor had sought to look into the record and verify if there was need to summon/call any other person/witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, Ld. Defence Counsels requested that matter may be taken up on 27.07.2026 and at their request, matter was thus listed.”
3. Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, submits, upon instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, that only one witness remains to be examined, and no other witness is proposed to be called by the prosecution.
4. I am also informed that the proceedings are next scheduled for 07.09.2026, and the last prosecution witness has been summoned.
5. In view of the fact that the trial is at the fag-end, Mr. Amjad Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, does not press the present application, but seeks directions for expeditious conclusion of proceedings.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Trial Court is requested to ensure that proceedings are concluded as expeditiously as possible. Mr. Chauhan assures the Court that the prosecution will also cooperate in the expeditious conclusion of the trial.
7. The application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawnin terms of the aforesaid.
8. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open in accordance with law before the Trial Court. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 19, 2026 “pv”/AD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2026 at 10:03:36