Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1437/2026 of RAJKUMAR SHARMA@SHANDILYA Vs LAKSHAY SINGHAL, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE on 18 August 2026
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010371612026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1437/2026 RAJKUMAR SHARMA@SHANDILYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Anilendra Pandey and Ms. Priya Shukla, Advs., along with petitioner in person. Mob: 7982903063 versus LAKSHAY SINGHAL, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
$~10
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010371612026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1437/2026
RAJKUMAR SHARMA@SHANDILYA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr Anilendra Pandey and Ms. Priya
Shukla, Advs., along with petitioner
in person.
Mob: 7982903063
versus
LAKSHAY SINGHAL, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr.
Raghvendra
Upadhyay,
Panel
Counsel GNCTD with Ms. Purnima
Jain and Mr. Madhur, Advs.
Mob: 9818720615
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 18.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 15th January, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 774/2025, wherein, the petitioner had been directed to approach the Deputy Commissioner/District Magistrate (“DM”), South East, New Delhi, by filing a fresh representation.
2. The said representation was directed to be decided by the said authority with due expedition.
3. This petition has come to be filed since the petitioner’s representation dated 21st January, 2026 has not been decided, despite the lapse of a long period of time. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2026 at 11:30:25
4. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent on advance notice submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be decided by the DM, South, New Delhi, and not the DM, South East, New Delhi, on account of re-organisation.
5. He further submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be decided, within a period of three months, in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that the DM, South, New Delhi, shall decide the representation of the petitioner, within a period of three months, from today.
7. In case, the aforesaid timeline is breached, and the petitioner is aggrieved by any non-compliance by the respondent, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the present petition.
8. Noting the aforesaid, the present petition is accordingly, disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 18, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2026 at 11:30:25