Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/634/2026 of AJAY DEEP CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Vs UNION OF INDIA on 18 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010375442026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 634/2026 AJAY DEEP CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Achyuth Ajithkumar, Mr. Shyam Gopal and Mr. Nikita Bhardwaj, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Devvrat Yadav (SPC)

$~68

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010375442026

+

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 634/2026

AJAY DEEP CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Achyuth Ajithkumar, Mr. Shyam

Gopal and Mr. Nikita Bhardwaj,

Advocates

versus

UNION OF INDIA

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Devvrat Yadav (SPC) with Mr.

Kartik Sharma, (GP)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

18.08.2026

1. The present Petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

2. Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constituted by this Court vide Order dated 05.12.2023 in ARB.P.557/2024. Procedural Order dated 09.07.2026 indicates that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has come to an end on 15.08.2026. The present petition has, therefore, been filed for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

3. It is stated that arbitration proceedings are at an advance stage inasmuch as the Arguments of the Petitioner are going on and, therefore, the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2026 at 11:58:08

mandate of the Arbitrator be extended for a period of 12 months.

4. The Apex Court in Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494, has held that an application for extension of the time period for passing an arbitral award under Section 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) is maintainable even after the expiry of the twelve-month or the extended six-month period, as the case may be.

5. In view of the facts of the present case, this Court is inclined to regularise the period from 15.08.2026 till today and extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal till 31.07.2027, so that the award can be pronounced.

6. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J AUGUST 18, 2026 Rahul This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2026 at 11:58:08

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead