Delhi High Court
ARB.P./915/2026 of KRISHNA ELECTRICAL WORKS Vs GOVERNMENT OF DELHI on 18 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No.DLHC010228952026 + ARB.P. 915/2026 KRISHNA ELECTRICAL WORKS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Kumar Singh, Advocate (through VC). versus GOVERNMENT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Panel Counsel for along with Mr. Mukesh Kumar and
$~2
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No.DLHC010228952026
+
ARB.P. 915/2026
KRISHNA ELECTRICAL WORKS
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Gaurav Kumar Singh, Advocate
(through VC).
versus
GOVERNMENT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Dinesh Malik, Panel Counsel for
along with Mr. Mukesh Kumar and
Mr. Dharam Singh, JEs for Govt. of
NCT of Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
%
18.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
5
Decisions referred to
In this index
5
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. The present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘A&C Act’) seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2. The disputes between the parties have arisen in the background of a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 23.02.2019, relating to “Construction of Sump well and Pump House at Escape Drain No. Near RD400m”.
3. A bid was submitted by the petitioner, in response to which, a letter of acceptance bearing reference no. EE/MD-II/Acs/W-06/2018-19/1536, dated 08.03.2019, was issued in favour of the petitioner.
4. Disputes between the parties have arisen on account of alleged non- payment of the final bill raised by the petitioner.
5. Clause 25 of the General Conditions of Contract (GCC) (as amended by O.M. dated 04.09.2017, issued by the authority of Director General, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2026 at 12:06:11
CPWD), incorporates the arbitration agreement, and the same reads as under:-
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2026 at 12:06:11
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2026 at 12:06:11
6. Disputes having arisen, the petitioner issued a notice invoking arbitration dated 07.03.2026. The same however, elicited no response. Hence, the present petition.
7. In terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Perkins Eastman This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2026 at 12:06:11
Architects DPC v. HSCC (India) Ltd, (2020) 20 SCC 760, TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd, (2017) 8 SCC 377, Bharat Broadband Network Limited v. United Telecoms Limited., 2019 SCC OnLine SC 547, SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning, 2024 INSC 532, and Interplay between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 & the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, In re,2023 SCC OnLine SC 1666, there is no impediment in constituting an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
8. Respective counsel for the parties also accede that an independent sole Arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
9. Accordingly, at jointly prayed, Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Advocate (Mob. No. +91 9755922222) is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
10. The respondent shall be at liberty to raise preliminary objections as regards arbitrability/jurisdiction, if any, which shall be decided by the Sole Arbitrator in accordance with law.
11. The learned Sole Arbitrator may proceed with the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing to the parties requisite disclosure as required under Section 12 of the A&C Act.
12. Let arbitration take place under the aegis of and as per the Rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC).
13. All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Sole Arbitrator on merits, in accordance with law.
14. Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of opinion of this Court on the merits of the case. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2026 at 12:06:11
15. The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
SACHIN DATTA, J AUGUST 18, 2026/ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2026 at 12:06:11