Delhi High Court

CRL.REV.P.(NI)/289/2026 of BANGALI RAM Vs RISHI PAL on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010380832026 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 289/2026 & CRL.M.As. 25137-25140/2026 BANGALI RAM .....Revisionist Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate. versus RISHI PAL .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

CRL.REV.P.(NI) 289/2026 Page 1 of 2

$~91

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010380832026

+

CRL.REV.P.(NI) 289/2026 & CRL.M.As. 25137-25140/2026

BANGALI RAM

.....Revisionist

Through:

Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate.

versus

RISHI PAL

.....Respondent

Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

17.08.2026

1. By way of this revision petition, the revisionist assails a judgment dated 09.01.2026, whereby the Sessions Court dismissed his appeal against a judgment of conviction dated 29.01.2025 and an order on sentence dated 31.01.2025, by which he was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days and to pay a fine of Rs. 8,00,000/-.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Sudeep Dey, learned counsel for the revisionist, seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition. However, Mr. Dey submits that the revisionist be permitted to approach the Executing Court for grant of some time to pay the fine amount as directed by the Magistrate’s Court and the Sessions Court.

3. As notice has not been issued to the respondent, the revisionist may make the aforesaid request before the concerned Court which may This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2026 at 12:03:55

CRL.REV.P.(NI) 289/2026 Page 2 of 2 consider the same in accordance with law, after hearing the parties.

4. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties before the Trial Court, in accordance with law, are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 17, 2026 tg/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2026 at 12:03:55

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead