Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./1923/2026 of ZAFAR ABBAS Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 pages $~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010096292026 + CRL.M.C. 1923/2026 & CRL. M.A. 7923/2026 ZAFAR ABBAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjum, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

CRL.M.C.1923/2026

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~29

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 14.08.2026

CNR No. DLHC010096292026

+

CRL.M.C. 1923/2026 & CRL. M.A. 7923/2026

ZAFAR ABBAS

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Anjum, Advocate with petitioner

in person.

versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State

with SI Deep Sharma and ASI Geeta

Shukla

Mr. Piyush Jha, Advocate for R-2

Respondent no. 2 in person (through

videoconferencing)

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 28/2023 of Police Station New Delhi Railway Station for offence under Section 354 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has settled the disputes with the petitioner.

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4 835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd 2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.14 16:43:03 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:14.08.2026 16:48:45 Signature Not Verified

CRL.M.C.1923/2026

Page 2 of 2 pages

2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

3. The respondent no.2 is present through videoconferencing today and is identified by IO/ASI Geeta Shukla. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with petitioner. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioner.

4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.

5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 28/2023 of Police Station New Delhi Railway Station for offence under Section 354 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Accompanying application also stands disposed of.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 14, 2026/as

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.14 16:43:23 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:14.08.2026 16:48:45 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead