Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/1027/2022 of ABHISHEK GUPTA Vs SHASHI KUMAR SHUKLA & ANR. on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010367282022 + CONT.CAS(C) 1027/2022 ABHISHEK GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Gupta and Ms. Disha Khurana, Advs. Mob: 9810618479 versus SHASHI KUMAR SHUKLA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC

$~1

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010367282022

+

CONT.CAS(C) 1027/2022

ABHISHEK GUPTA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Anupam Gupta and Ms. Disha

Khurana, Advs.

Mob: 9810618479

versus

SHASHI KUMAR SHUKLA & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC

with Ms. Sonali Modi, Mr. Mukul

Dev, Advs. for R-2, along with Mr.

Deepak, SI, PS Bindapur.

Mob: 7605925091

Email:

sonalimodipersonal@gmail.com

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 14.08.2026

1. This Court is informed by learned counsel appearing for the Delhi Police that pursuant to the directions of this Court, the second floor of the premises in question, i.e., property bearing no. RZ-1/2, South Extension, Part-III, Uttam Nagar, Delhi, has been handed back to the petitioner.

2. The aforesaid fact is verified by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner has been duly handed over the possession of second floor of the premises in question.

3. This Court notes the submission made by learned counsel appearing This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:19:49

for the Delhi Police that they have video-graphed the whole procedure, and that the second floor of the premises in question was found to be empty with just some garbage/debris lying therein.

4. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 1 was also required to pay the user charges for the premises in question, and an amount of Rs. 81,000/- (Rupees Eighty-One Thousand Only) is due and payable to the petitioner in regard thereto.

5. He further submits that he shall take appropriate steps in execution proceedings for recovery of the said amount.

6. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

7. Since, respondent no. 1 has already vacated the premises in question, at request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, it is directed that respondent no. 1 shall not unnecessarily visit the premises in question.

8. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 14, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:19:49

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead