Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/2452/2026 of RAJESH RAJA Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010376312026 + W.P.(CRL) 2452/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24828/2026 RAJESH RAJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anindya Malhotra, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Mr.

W.P.(CRL) 2452/2026

$~90

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010376312026

+

W.P.(CRL) 2452/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24828/2026

RAJESH RAJA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Anindya Malhotra, Advocate.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with

Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Ms. Priya Rai,

Mr. Shubham Goyal, Mr. Avinash

Kumar Singh, Mr. Priyansh Raj

Singh, Advocates.

SI Manish.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 14.08.2026

1. The petitioner stands convicted in connection with FIR No. 48/2001, registered at Police Station Rajinder Nagar, for offences punishable under Sections 302, 186, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, and has been sentenced to life imprisonment. He has undergone more than 15 years of actual incarceration, in addition to over four years of remission. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution pertains to his application seeking transfer to a semi-open jail.

2. Issue notice. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, learned Additional Standing This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:58:50

W.P.(CRL) 2452/2026

Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the State.

3. Mr. Tyagi submits that applications of this nature are considered by the Selection Committee constituted under Rule 1320 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. He further submits that the petitioner’s case could not be considered at the last meeting of the Committee as the petitioner was then on furlough and, consequently, was not available for interview. He states that the petitioner’s case shall be considered at the next meeting of the Committee, which is scheduled to be held within the next three months.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission, Mr. Anindya Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no further relief is sought at this stage.

5. The petition, alongwith the pending application, is accordingly disposed of, binding the respondent to the aforesaid submission and without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the petitioner.

6. A copy of this order be communicated to the concerned Jail Authorities for necessary information and compliance. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 14, 2026 SS/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:58:50

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead