Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/11790/2026 of AMIT AND ORS Vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010378142026 + W.P.(C) 11790/2026 CM APPL. 54441-54442/2026 AMIT AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azad Bansala, Mr. Navdeep Suhag, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi and Mr. Nikunj Arora, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF

$~20

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010378142026

+

W.P.(C) 11790/2026 CM APPL. 54441-54442/2026

AMIT AND ORS

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Sr. Adv. with

Mr.

Azad

Bansala,

Mr.

Navdeep

Suhag, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi and Mr.

Nikunj Arora, Advs.

versus

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

.....Respondent

Through:

Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC GNCTD

Services

with

Mr.

Nitesh

Kumar

Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr.

Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 14.08.2026

1. An objection has been taken by the learned counsel for the respondents that the present petition is not maintainable before this Court as the remedy for the petitioners is to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal).

2. On this, Mr. Ankur Chhibber, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would submit that as the impugned rules have been upheld by the Tribunal, in O.A. 1625/2022, no purpose would be served for the petitioners to approach the Tribunal.

3. We are not in agreement with the said submission. At this stage Mr. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2026 at 11:25:31

Chhibber submits that the petitioners shall approach the Tribunal to challenge the rules at the earliest, as the last date for submitting the applications is today.

4. Surely, it goes without saying that if any application is filed, the Tribunal shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law.

5. The petition is disposed of. The pending applications are also disposed of on having became infructuous. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J AUGUST 14, 2026 rk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2026 at 11:25:31

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead