Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/555/2025 of MANISH KUMAR SHARMA Vs VIJAY KUMAR SINGH on 14 August 2026
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010196322025 + CONT.CAS(C) 555/2025 MANISH KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nagender Vashisht, Adv., along with petitioner in person. Mob: 9810196114 Email: vashishtnagender@gmail.com versus VIJAY KUMAR SINGH .....Respondent
$~3
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010196322025
+
CONT.CAS(C) 555/2025
MANISH KUMAR SHARMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Nagender Vashisht, Adv., along
with petitioner in person.
Mob: 9810196114
Email: vashishtnagender@gmail.com
versus
VIJAY KUMAR SINGH
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Arti Bansal and Ms. Shruti Goel,
Advs. for DDA
Mob: 9999442349
Email:
artibansalassociates@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 14.08.2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 19th February, 2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 2432/2024, titled as Manish Kumar Sharma Versus Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
2. The order dated 19th February, 2024, reads as under:
3. Perusal of the aforesaid order shows that the writ petition filed by the petitioner was directed to be considered as a representation by the respondent – Delhi Development Authority (“DDA”).
4. Accordingly, learned counsel appearing for the respondent – DDA, representing the Special Task Force (“STF”), submits that the said writ petition was considered as a representation, and a Speaking Order dated 02nd July, 2025, has been passed in regard thereto.
5. She draws the attention of this Court to the relevant portion of the said Speaking Order, which reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx”
6. Considering the aforesaid, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
7. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 14, 2026/SK