Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./6919/2025 of RAJIV MAHESHWARI Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010731062025 + CRL.M.C. 6919/2025 RAJIV MAHESHWARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aljo K Joseph, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: SI Manisha, PS Punjabi Bagh. Mr. Sanket Khandelwal, Ms.

$~84

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010731062025

+

CRL.M.C. 6919/2025

RAJIV MAHESHWARI

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Aljo K Joseph, Advocate.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through:

SI Manisha, PS Punjabi Bagh.

Mr.

Sanket

Khandelwal,

Ms.

Vyomica Paul & Mr. Rewtikant

Singh, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 14.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 24932/2026 (for early hearing) This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking early hearing of the captioned petition, which is next scheduled to be listed on 15.10.2026. For the reasons stated therein, early hearing is allowed, and the petition is taken on Board. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6919/2025 & CRL.M.A. 32034/2025 (for stay)

1. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 834/2023, dated 24.11.2023, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, District West, Delhi, under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:22:51

and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. After some arguments, Mr. Aljo K. Joseph, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions available to the petitioner at the stage of framing of charges/discharge application, if any.

3. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission.

4. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on any petition that may hereafter be filed by the petitioner, which shall be considered by the appropriate Court on its own merits and in accordance with law.

5. Needless to say, all rights and contentions of the parties are left open.

6. The next date of hearing already fixed, i.e. 15.10.2026, stands cancelled. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 14, 2026 ‘ng’/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:22:51

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead