Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1452/2026 of JANHIT SEWA SAMITI (REGD. ), Vs MR. K.C. SURENDRA AND ORS on 14 August 2026
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010375822026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1452/2026 & CM APPLs. 54035/2026 & 54036/2026 JANHIT SEWA SAMITI (REGD. ), .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Advocate. (M): 9899186420 Email: maroofadvocate46@gmail.com versus MR. K.C. SURENDRA
$~31
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010375822026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1452/2026 & CM APPLs. 54035/2026 & 54036/2026
JANHIT SEWA SAMITI (REGD. ),
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Maroof Ahmad, Advocate.
(M): 9899186420
Email: maroofadvocate46@gmail.com
versus
MR. K.C. SURENDRA AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, ASC with
Mr. Arindam Bharadwaj, Mr. Udit
Chauhan and Mr. Ahmad Kamaal,
Advocates for respondent no. 1/MCD.
(M): 9811578575
Email: anschauhan.co@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 14.08.2026 CM APPL. 54035/2026 (For exemption)
1. The present application has been filed seeking exemption from filing certified copies of the annexures, appended to the present petition.
2. Exemption allowed, subject to filing of the same, within a period of four weeks, from today.
3. Application is accordingly disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1452/2026 & CM APPL. 54036/2026
4. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the judgment dated 25th September, 2019, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P. (C) 364/2019, wherein, with regards to fire safety certificate, it had been directed as follows: “xxx xxx xxx
5. We see no reason to go into detail for each and every building of this city of Delhi. Suffice it to say to the respondents that as and when any building is lacking in fire safety measures, action shall be initiated by the respondents in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case as early as possible and practicable and if any fire safety measures are not installed in such buildings, the respondents are at liberty to seal the premises or to take other action in accordance with law. xxx xxx xxx”
5. On the basis of the aforesaid judgment, the present petition has been filed mentioning a property in the colony of Burari, situated in Khasra No. 497, situated in Shakti Enclave, Burari, Delhi.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has raised vehement objections to the maintainability of the present petition as well as to the locus of the petitioner.
7. Having heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties, this Court notes that the judgment dated 25th September, 2019, is a general direction issued to the respondents with regard to taking action wherever a building is lacking in fire safety measures.
8. Accordingly, it is for the respondents to undertake such exercise as and when such discrepancy is noticed in any building.
9. Accordingly, directing the respondents to comply with the directions issued by the Division Bench as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of.
10. Pending application also stands disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 14, 2026 c