Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./3297/2026 of RAHIL BESOYA Vs STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI) THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SOUTH, NEW DELHI. & ANR. on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3297/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 3298/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~86 & 87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010372652026 + BAIL APPLN. 3297/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24650-51/2026 RAHIL BESOYA .....Petitioner Versus STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI) THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SOUTH,

BAIL APPLN. 3297/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 3298/2026 Page 1 of 2

$~86 & 87

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010372652026

+

BAIL APPLN. 3297/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24650-51/2026

RAHIL BESOYA

.....Petitioner

Versus

STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI) THROUGH DEPUTY

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SOUTH, NEW DELHI.

& ANR.

.....Respondents

CNR No. DLHC010372662026

+

BAIL APPLN. 3298/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24652-53/2026

MEENA JOSHI

.....Petitioner

Versus

STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI) THROUGH DEPUTY

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SOUTH, NEW DELHI

& ANR.

.....Respondents

Appearances:

Ms. Charu Dalal, Mr. Choudhary Amit Bassoya, Advocates for Ps.

Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with SI Garima, PS: Malviya Nagar.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

13.08.2026

1. By way of these applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek grant of transit/ limited anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No 42/2026, dated 17.07.2026, registered at P.S. Cyber Crime Police Station, Bengaluru This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:05:55

BAIL APPLN. 3297/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 3298/2026 Page 2 of 2 City, State of Karnataka, under Sections 43, 66(C), 66(D), 66(E), 67, 72, 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 318(4), 308, 78, and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. After some arguments, Ms. Charu Dalal, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw these applications, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

3. The bail applications, alongwith pending applications, are dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

4. It is clarified that this Court has not made any observation on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties in any future application are left open. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 13, 2026 Tg/AD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:05:55

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead