Delhi High Court
CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)/461/2026 of VIKRAM PRAKASH Vs PARSHOTTAM PRAKASH DECEASED THROUGH LR SMT SANGEETA KUMAR & ANR. on 13 August 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010373392026 + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 461/2026 & CRL.M.As. 24664-67/2026 VIKRAM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Khanna, Mr. Gobund Malhotra and Mr. Rehan Khan, Advocates. versus PARSHOTTAM PRAKASH DECEASED
CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 461/2026 Page 1 of 2
$~101
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010373392026
+
CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 461/2026 & CRL.M.As. 24664-67/2026
VIKRAM PRAKASH
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Kartik Khanna, Mr. Gobund
Malhotra and Mr. Rehan Khan,
Advocates.
versus
PARSHOTTAM PRAKASH DECEASED THROUGH LR SMT
SANGEETA KUMAR & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
13.08.2026
1. By way of this revision petition, the petitioner assails an order dated 21.12.2023, passed by the Family Court, whereby the daughter of the respondents [the deceased decree-holders] was allowed to be substituted as their legal representative, in their place, in an execution petition filed against the petitioner.
2. After some arguments, Mr. Kartik Khanna, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner before the learned Executing Court. Mr. Khanna states that he will request the learned Executing Court to consider his objection to execution.
3. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, in view of the above. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:25:35
CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 461/2026 Page 2 of 2
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the maintainability or merits of the aforesaid objection. The same may be considered by the learned Executing Court, in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 13, 2026 SS/MK/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2026 at 11:25:35