Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/11552/2026 of NATIONAL DENTAL COMMISSION Vs PRADEEP KUMAR & ANR. on 12 August 2026
Page 1 of 2 $~117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010371492026 + W.P.(C) 11552/2026 and CM APPLs. 53540-43/2026 NATIONAL DENTAL COMMISSION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal and Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocates versus PRADEEP KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents
WP(C) 11552/2026
$~117
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010371492026
+
W.P.(C) 11552/2026 and CM APPLs. 53540-43/2026
NATIONAL DENTAL COMMISSION
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Pritish Sabharwal and Ms.
Shweta Singh, Advocates
versus
PRADEEP KUMAR & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amrit Singh, Ms. Muskan
Mahajan and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advs for
R1
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPC with Mr. Gopesh
Jindal and Ms. Anjali, Advocates for R2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R (ORAL)
%
12.08.2026
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After some hearing, Mr. Sabharwal, learned counsel for the petitioner only restricts his prayer to a request to the Tribunal to take up and decide MA 3694/2026 filed by him. He is also agreeable to comply with the impugned order dated 29 May 2026 passed by the Tribunal subject, however, to the outcome of the MA.
2. Accordingly, subject to the petitioner complying with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and showing proof thereof to the Tribunal, we request the Tribunal to take up the MA 3694/2026 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:13.08.2026 18:31:57 Signature Not Verified
WP(C) 11552/2026
filed by the petitioner for modification / vacation of the impugned stay order on 27 August 2026. We, however, make two aspects clear. The first is that, we have not pronounced in any manner on the merit of the dispute or on the merit of the application for modification / vacation, which would be decided on its own merits. The second is that taking back of the respondent in service would not create any equities in favour of the respondent in so far as the modification application is concerned.
3. Both sides will appear before the Tribunal on 27 August 2026 to hear on the modification application. Neither side would be entitled to take an adjournment on the said date.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. C.HARI SHANKAR, J AMIT MAHAJAN, J AUGUST 12, 2026/yg Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:13.08.2026 18:31:57 Signature Not Verified