Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/219/2026 of MAHESH KUMAR YADAV Vs AMITA YADAV on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 $~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12th August, 2026 # CNR No. DLHC010040912026 + CONT.CAS(C) 219/2026 MAHESH KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prateek, Advocate Mob: 9871680565 Email: prateeklegal7@gmail.com versus AMITA YADAV .....Respondent Through:

$~55

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 12th August, 2026

CNR No. DLHC010040912026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 219/2026

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Prateek, Advocate

Mob: 9871680565

Email: prateeklegal7@gmail.com

versus

AMITA YADAV

.....Respondent

Through:

Ms. Rashi Yadav, Advocate with

Respondent in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-father submits that the petitioner-father has not been able to meet the two minor children, i.e., a girl aged 14 years and a boy aged 07 years, for the last one and a half years.

2. However, the respondent-Ms. Amita Yadav is present in Court along with both the minor children.

3. On pointed query, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-father submits that the petitioner-father was present in Court, but he has already left the Court premises on account of some official work.

4. The respondent-mother, who is present in Court, submits that she has no objection if the children meet with the petitioner-father.

5. The minor daughter, who is present before this Court, submits that she Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:14.08.2026 18:14:56 Signature Not Verified is currently studying in Class X, and she would be comfortable with meeting the petitioner-father in the presence of the respondent-mother.

6. This Court is further informed that the petitioner-father has not paid the school fees of the minor children for approximately last four months.

7. Accordingly, the following directions are issued: I. The petitioner-father shall clear the arrears of school fees of the minor children, forthwith. II. The petitioner father shall continue to make regular payments towards the school fees of the minor children. III. As agreed before this Court, the minor children shall meet the petitioner-father in the presence of the respondent-mother on every 01st Sunday of each month at Vegas Mall, Dwarka, between 12:00 PM to 02:00 PM. IV. In case, on any Sunday, it is not possible for the children to meet the petitioner-father, due prior intimation shall be given by the respondent-mother. In that eventuality, the visitation shall be fixed, with the consent of both the parties, on some other convenient date. V. Any belongings of the children, including their school bags, toys or clothes shall be handed over by the petitioner-father to the children on their next meeting.

8. Accordingly, with the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 12, 2026/ak Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:14.08.2026 18:14:56 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead