Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/761/2024 of CHET RAM KAUSHIK Vs GYANESH BHARTI COMMISIONER OF MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI on 11 August 2026
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010263602024 + CONT.CAS(C) 761/2024 CHET RAM KAUSHIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kaushik, son of the Petitioner (through VC) versus GYANESH BHARTI COMMISIONER OF MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev
$~20
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010263602024
+
CONT.CAS(C) 761/2024
CHET RAM KAUSHIK
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Sumit
Kaushik,
son
of
the
Petitioner (through VC)
versus
GYANESH BHARTI COMMISIONER OF MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Sanjeev Sahrawat, SC, MCD
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 11.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 05th March, 2024, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 3109/2024.
2. By way of the said order, directions had been passed for taking action against the unauthorized and illegal construction on the property bearing Mustil no. 17, Khasra no. 611 and Khasra no. 15, admeasuring 1880 square yards situated in Sangam Vihar, B-Block, New Delhi.
3. This Court is informed that vide order dated 27th May, 2024, in Appeal no. 248/2024, passed by the Presiding Officer, Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“ATMCD”), has restrained the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), from taking any further demolition action qua the property in question. The aforesaid order passed by the ATMCD reads as under:
4. It is also informed that the appeal before the ATMCD, is still pending and is listed for hearing on 18th September, 2026.
5. It is further informed that the aforesaid interim order dated 27th May, 2024, is still continuing.
6. This Court is informed that the petitioner herein has also filed an application for impleadment before the ATMCD.
7. Considering the submissions made before this Court, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
8. Accordingly, the MCD is directed to take requisite action, subject to any orders that may be passed by the ATMCD.
9. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by any non-action on the part of the MCD, subject to any order that may be passed by the ATMCD, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek his remedies in accordance with law, including revival of the present petition.
10. In view of terms as noted hereinabove, the present petition is accordingly, disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 11, 2026/au