Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5670/2026 of ANKIT RAJ Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011106752025 + CRL.M.C. 5670/2026 ANKIT RAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Harshita Pottangi, Ms. Aashi Arora, Mr. Shirish Singh, Mr. Aryan Vaibhav Srivastav, Advocates. versus

$~84

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC011106752025

+

CRL.M.C. 5670/2026

ANKIT RAJ

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Suryanarayana

Singh,

Sr.

Advocate

with

Ms.

Harshita

Pottangi, Ms. Aashi Arora, Mr.

Shirish Singh, Mr. Aryan Vaibhav

Srivastav, Advocates.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Ajit, SI

Anup Rana, PS-Khyala.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 11.08.2026 CRL.M.A. 23709/2026 (condonation of delay in re-filing) By way of this application, the petitioner seeks to condone the delay of 20 days in re-filing the captioned petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, and the delay in re-filing is accordingly condoned. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5670/2026&CRL.M.A. 23708/2026 (stay)

1. At the very outset, Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, submits that there are certain factual errors in the present petition and that the relevant orders of the Supreme Court This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:10:47

have neither been referred to nor annexed thereto. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file an appropriate petition incorporating all necessary averments and annexures.

2. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 11, 2026 “B”/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:10:47

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead