Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5838/2026 of AMIT OBEROI AND ANR. Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO AND ANR. on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010367792026 + CRL.M.C. 5838/2026 AMIT OBEROI AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, Mr. Mayank Ahuja, Mr. Parminder Singh and Ms. Manisha, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO AND ANR.

$~101

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010367792026

+

CRL.M.C. 5838/2026

AMIT OBEROI AND ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, Mr. Mayank

Ahuja, Mr. Parminder Singh and

Ms. Manisha, Advocates.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO

AND ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP.

Ms.

Priyanka

Tomar,

Mr.

Bhoopesh Pandey, Mr. Kanishk

and Ms. Shrishti Jain, Advocates

for R-2.

SI Shruti Saini.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 11.08.2026

1. The petitioners, who are arraigned as accused in FIR No. 798/2026 dated 08.07.2026, registered at P.S. Karol Bagh, New Delhi, under Sections 318(4)/316(2)/336(3)/340(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, have approached this Court seeking quashing of the aforesaid FIR on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.

2. The Settlement Agreement-cum-Memorandum of Understanding [“MOU”] dated 13.07.2026 records that the petitioners are required to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:09:19

pay a total sum of Rs. 13,50,000/-, out of which a sum of Rs. 6,75,000/- has already been paid, with the balance amount to be paid within four months from the date of execution of the MOU.

3. Since the terms of the MOU have not yet been fully complied with, Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action upon full compliance with the terms of the MOU.

4. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Ms. Priyanka Tomar, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, also assures the Court that respondent No. 2 shall duly comply with his obligations under the terms of the MOU. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 11, 2026 SS/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:09:19

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead