Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1393/2024 of KAMALUDDIN ALIAS KAMAL UDDIN AND ORS. Vs SANJAY ARORA AND ORS. on 11 August 2026
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010574372024 + CONT.CAS(C) 1393/2024 & CM APPL. 51174/2024, CM APPL. 51173/2024 KAMALUDDIN ALIAS KAMAL UDDIN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Swagata Gupta, Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra, Mr. Rishi Raj, Advocates Mob: 8013313825
$~22
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010574372024
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1393/2024 & CM APPL. 51174/2024, CM APPL.
51173/2024
KAMALUDDIN ALIAS KAMAL UDDIN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Swagata Gupta, Mr. Kamlesh Kr.
Mishra, Mr. Rishi Raj, Advocates
Mob: 8013313825
Email: swagatagupta.00@gmail.com
versus
SANJAY ARORA AND ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Ms. Richa Dhawan, Sr. Panel Counsel
(UOI), Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms.
Yashita Jain and Ms. Sneha Tanwar,
Advocates for UOI.
Mob: 9810473166
Email: ac10.adv@gmail.com
SI Rahul, PS- Saket.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 11.08.2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed against the respondents for alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 06th August, 2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 10831/2024.
2. The order dated 06th August, 2024, reads as under:
3. Perusal of the aforesaid order shows that it has been directed that the petitioners shall not be disturbed from carrying out their vending activities on the given area, i.e., Open Space, Saket, Mandir Marg, nearby M Block Bus Stop, South Zone, Ward S-67, Delhi, provided the said activities are carried strictly in terms of the Certificates of Vending (“CoVs”).
4. This Court notes the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the Delhi Police that the Delhi Police has advised the vendors on account of the fact that there were complaints with regard to the vendors operating in the said area, causing significant traffic congestion during peak hours due to lack proper management.
5. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners draws the attention of this Court to the CoV of petitioner no. 3, which is as under:
6. By referring to the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the CoV of the petitioner clearly states that he can vend qua food/snack with gas cylinder/fire, it is not possible for him to move from one place to another and that he ought to be allowed to vend at one particular place.
7. Clause 11 of the CoV, reads as under:
8. Perusal of the aforesaid shows that mobile vendors shall not stay or vend for more than 30 minutes, or time prescribed by the Town Vending Committee (“TVC”) at one place in a vending/squatting zone.
9. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to seek clarification from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) with regard to their prayer of squatting. In case, they are allowed to vend qua food/snack with gas cylinder/fire, the respondents would not obstruct the vending activities of the petitioners as long as the vending activities are carried out strictly in accordance with the respective conditions as contained in the CoVs.
10. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications. MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 11, 2026 ak