Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./5828/2026 of DEEPAK KUMAR Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010366872026 + CRL.M.C. 5828/2026 DEEPAK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harender Kumar Sangwan and Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/SI Ravinder

$~78

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010366872026

+

CRL.M.C. 5828/2026

DEEPAK KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Harender Kumar Sangwan and

Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocates.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State

with IO/SI Ravinder Kumar.

Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary, CGSC with

Mr. Rahul Maurya, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

11.08.2026

CRL.M.A. 24306/2026 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5828/2026

2. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 142/2021 of Police Station Crime Branch Chankyapuri for the offence under Section 419/420/ 467/468/471/120B/34 IPC.

3. At the outset, learned APP assisted by IO/SI Ravinder Kumar accepts notice and submits that the petitioner is not even required in the subject FIR’s investigation. To this, learned counsel for petitioner submits that This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2026 at 10:55:57

petitioner received a notice under Section 41(A) CrPC calling him upon to join investigation. But learned APP submits that subsequently by way of intimation dated 07.08.2026, the present petitioner has already been informed that there is no case against him.

4. In view of the above submission made by learned prosecutor on instructions of IO, the learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh, in case at any stage in future, the petitioner is called by the IO or the Court.

5. Accordingly, the petition and accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J AUGUST 11, 2026/ry This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2026 at 10:55:57

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead